Cleanse THC in Your Hair and Learn About Advantages of Various Drug Screening Methods
When it comes to drug testing, you should have in mind that there are differences between various testing methods depending on biological specimens used for it, such as hair, saliva, urine, or blood.
However, we cannot say which one is the best, because the choice depends on numerous factors such as company’s level of tolerance, federal regulations, expanses, detection window and the reasons for testing that could be due to reasonable suspicion, random, pre-employment and post-accident screening.
Every single testing method features advantages and disadvantages as well as ways to tamper with the results. For instance, urinalysis is the simplest to adulterate, while a hair follicle drug test requires an appropriate hair cleanser for a drug test.
A Brief History of Drug Testing
During the 80s, urinalysis became the first method for drug screening as the idea to maintain a drug-free workplace. Therefore, urinalysis became a gold standard since it could detect short-term usage as well as substance abuse behavior.
The main reason for its popularity started because it was profoundly simple to transport and collect urine specimen, it had an affordable price tag, and it was accurate and provided enough detection window that every employer could handle.
Since urine positivity rates decreased as time went by to a certain level, professionals started raising suspicion on whether people found ways to adulterate and subvert drug screenings.
That was the main reason why they implemented other types of screening, such as hair analysis as the most efficient way to check someone’s long-term drug abuse.
If you have not evaluated different methods for drug screening, you should know that every single method features weaknesses and strengths.
The urine drug test was the most popular, but people found out ways how to tamper with the results, which brought us to a point in creating ways that were challenging to cheat.
Easiest ways to learn more on cannabis screenings is by checking here for more information.
We decided to present to you the advantages and disadvantages of each drug testing method so that you can see which one is the best for your particular company:
We have mentioned above that urine drug screening was and still is the most common and popular method for checking whether someone uses drugs or not. The main reason for that is due to the least invasive procedure for taking specimen as well as affordability that comes with it.
The main problem that lies with it is the ability to tamper with the test, especially in the case your employees are conducting samples without supervision.
- Affordable price tag
- Proven track record and longevity within the drug testing industry among employers
- It can detect numerous types of drugs, as well as short-term abuse. The main exception is cannabis that may remain in urine for months in case of frequent consumption.
- It is approved for federal testing, which means that regulations are considering it as a suitable method.
- It is common for numerous screening reasons such as random, post-accident, pre-employment, follow-up, reasonable suspicion, and return-to-duty testing.
- It is simple to manipulate it
- You can place something in urine or use someone else’s so that you can pass the test
- You can dilute the urine by drinking plenty of fluids beforehand, but most employers nowadays can detect dilution and fail the participant.
- You have to pay a higher price tag for screening under supervision because if you allow employees to do everything by themselves, you will have higher levels of adulteration and cheating.
- It cannot measure the frequency of drug abuse as well as momentary impairment
- Saliva Drug Screening
You should have in mind that oral fluid or saliva drug test requires medical personnel and supervised observation, which means that you will not be able to tamper with the overall results.
It is an excellent choice because it is affordable and you can conduct it in both laboratory and remote work location under supervision.
The main problem with it is a small detection window, which means that it is efficient if you wish to detect current impairment, which employers conduct post-accident or due to reasonable doubt.
- Affordable price tag when compared with other screening methods
- It can detect the momentary impairment up to two days
- It is challenging to cheat the test because it requires direct observation
- It is accurate the same way as urine
- You can conduct it due to numerous screening reasons we’ve mentioned above
- It features short term detection window which includes a maximum of 48 hours of drug abuse
- It is not approved for federal testing
- It won’t provide you the ability to check long term and frequency of substance abuse
If you wish to learn how to pass this particular screening method, you should check out this website: https://www.wikihow.com/Pass-a-Mouth-Swab-Test.
Have in mind that hair follicle drug test is a useful solution for return-to-duty as well as pre-employment screenings because it will provide you long detection window as well as the ability to check the patterns of abuse.
In case you have problems with misusing prescription drugs or any other illegal substance, you will not be able to cleanse your hair in a matter of days before the test. Therefore, it is a perfect choice as the addition that will determine whether an applicant has a history of drug usage.
It is highly challenging to cheat with it, and even though you can use detoxification shampoo as well as Macujo method for hair cleansing, you will not be able to avoid it naturally.
Since it features a detection window of 90 days, it can detect patterns of use, which is a useful thing to know before hiring someone.
- It can detect long term drug abuse that could go up to three months or ninety days
- High rates of positive results, and it is a perfect test for the detection of cocaine abusers
- It can reveal patterns of drug abuse which is vital for pre-employment screening
- It is not that simple to cheat it
- Expensive price tag
- It cannot detect short term drug use
- It cannot detect sporadic substance abuse
- It is not federally approved